Suggestion for a new Download page
Jonas Pasche
mail at jonaspasche.de
Fri Feb 6 16:14:30 UTC 2004
Hi Eric,
> > The description of "updgrade" is a bit backwards: "upgrade" operation
> > will never, ever install any new packages or remove others, changed
> > dependencies or not. It'll just not upgrade something with changed
> > dependencies and on RHL that can be bad - see below.
>
> Hmmm... That's not what I've read/seen. I've not changed this yet.
> Can someone write up a new description for this command that is
> correct for FL apt?
The man page of apt-get is very clear on this:
--- cut ---
upgrade
upgrade is used to install the newest versions of all packages
currently installed on the system from the sources enumerated in
/etc/apt/sources.list. Packages currently installed with new
>>> versions available are retrieved and upgraded; under no circum-
>>> stances are currently installed packages removed, or packages
>>> not already installed retrieved and installed. New versions of
currently installed packages that cannot be upgraded without
changing the install status of another package will be left at
their current version. An update must be performed first so that
apt-get knows that new versions of packages are available.
--- cut ---
So Panu is right on this.
Jonas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040206/17805e8a/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list