Regarding QA

[Eric Rostetter]

Quoting Todd <Freedom_Lover at pobox.com>:

> For example, say you're going to QA apt (cause everyone wants to),

I'd love to (now that I have gpg keys and all).

> you'd find it in bugzilla and look at the entries there.  You see that
> in Jason's latest comment there he's linked these two files:
>
>    https://mail.codegrinder.com/www/apt4/md5sum.asc
>    
> https://mail.codegrinder.com/www/apt4/apt-0.5.15cnc5-0.fdr.7.rh73.legacy.src.rpm
>
> Download them both.  Then run rpm --checksig -v (or just -Kv if you're
> lazy like me) on the rpm file.  Assuming you already have Jason's key
> (and you probably don't yet, but we'll get to that later), you should
> get output like this:

Uhm, but that is a rh73 file, no?  What if I want to test it on rh72 or
rh8?  Is no one working on these?  Do I need to create them myself?
I find the thread in bugzilla hard to follow myself...

I'm not against making apt rh8 rpms, I just not sure if that is what
I should be doing or not, etc.

It appears slocate has made it to the fedora-testing phase, so I'll see if
I can't help QA that at least...

--
Eric Rostetter
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: PGP Digital Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040206/c8aaff41/attachment.sig>