Fedora Legacy Launch Plan (draft 2)

[Troy Dawson]

Chuck Wolber wrote:
> 
>>1) Clear separation between the official RH/FC updates and Legacy updates.
> 
> 
> Ok, I can understand that. But instead of legacy, why not flrh7.3, 
> flrh8.0, flrh9?
> 

I really have no overall opinion about how they are marked, as long as they 
are marked in some way.  But I don't think flrh is a very good mark.  It took 
me about 3 times reading it through wondering why you would want to mark it 
"Fermi Linux Red Hat".

flrh (besides being very vague) is really only 2 letters shorter.

Troy

-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  dawson at fnal.gov  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________