Legacy packages in need of QA

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:24:22 -0500, Charles R. Anderson wrote:

> Please help us with QA for these packages so we can get them published 
> soon.
> 
> yum for 7.x
> 	https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1176

With the previous work on this one and your own QA, these should be easy
to review and approve and ideal for people who are new to the system. This
one has one publish vote already.

> mpg321 security patch
> 	https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1186

The patch is straight-forward to review, syntactically and semantically
correct and does not introduce any compilation issues. Anyone with access
to a rh72 or rh73 machine and Red Hat's last src.rpm could verify it.

My question here is that this reintroduces mp3 software to the fedora.us
system. How's that dealt with?
 
-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040108/9bb6dab8/attachment.sig>