Update Announcement Format discussion

[Jesse Keating]

On Saturday 10 January 2004 21:56, Pekka Savola wrote:
> I wouldn't used bugzilla-id in the header; they aren't sequential,
> and the users will get confused ("did I miss 15 security
> advisories?!?!").

Hrm point taken.  I suppose we'll have to come up w/ a good numbering 
scheme and a way to ensure no cross numbers.

> I'd suggest just allocating a number on FCFS basis
>
> > Product:           Red Hat Linux
>
> Not sure if there may be a trademark issue here.. Perhaps one should
> add a preamble "0. About Fedora Legacy", plus 1-2 sentences to
> describe the relation to Red Hat Linux.

Just because "Red Hat Linux" is trademarked, doesn't mean we can't 
mention it in a document.  The update would in fact be for Red Hat 
Linux.  We can have somewhere at the bottom of the thing that Red Hat 
Linux is a trademark of blah....

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
Mondo DevTeam           (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating