Update Announcement Format discussion

[Jason]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:20:45AM -0800, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> 
> But that's the thing I'm getting at. It's incredibly easy to create a web 
> form that looks like a fill-in-the-blanks template. Rather than having to 
> resort to some hacked XML format (which would never work with humans at 
> the helm), a form template would allow us to  1) separate out the data 
> segments so they're individually searchable,  2) ensure that everything 
> is consistently formatted and  3) Numbering would be immutably accurate.
> 

It may be easy to do, but it's rather pointless if we never have anyone
QA, the packages in the bugzilla so that they can be released.  That
said, I think it's a good idea once we get rolling.  But if I had a
choice where a few hours of work were spent, it'd be in QA or patching.

for any lurkers with free time :)
http://www.fedora.us/wiki/PackageSubmissionQAPolicy
http://fedora.us/LEGACY

-jason
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040112/7a699cb6/attachment.sig>