tcpdump and elm questions.

[Johnny Strom]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Friday 16 January 2004 08:08, Jesse Keating wrote:
> 
>>epoch always wins in a version comparison.  Package-4.2 with epoch 14 is
>>considered newer than Package-8.1 with epoch 13.  For this reason, I do
>>believe you should set the epoch of the newer distro up by one.  Correct
>>me if I'm wrong, but this will ensure that the package gets updated if
>>somebody upgrades from 7.2 to 7.3.  Otherwise, since they have the same
>>name, the package wouldn't get upgraded.  I don't particularly like
>>epoch, but since it's already in use here, might as well take advantage
>>of it.
> 
> 
> Ok, some folks have thwacked me upside the head with a big foam clue bat.  
> Leave epoch alone.  Just bump the build number to indicate a newer 
> package.  Take the existing largest build number for the package, and bump 
> it by one for 7.1, by 2 for 7.2, by 3 for 7.3, etc..
> 
> Does this make sense?


Yes it seems fine.



> 
> - -- 
> Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE	(http://geek.j2solutions.net)
> Fedora Legacy Team	(http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
> Mondo DevTeam		(www.mondorescue.org)
> GPG Public Key		(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
> 
> Was I helpful?  Let others know:
>  http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFACA8E4v2HLvE71NURAsd2AKCKWrLizAfuSeg1RF5IcUjwkyYcZACgsQC2
> uayFw/zomx9zzyGC+P8OSWg=
> =mU+r
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
>