tcpdump and elm questions.
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Fri Jan 16 17:27:35 UTC 2004
On Friday 16 January 2004 08:55, Christian Pearce wrote:
> I guess it isn't for me. I want to try and clarify.
>
> In all cases leave epoch alone.
>
> We use the same spec file but the _revisions_ are different.
>
> elm:
>
> dist|orig|legacy
> 7.2 elm-2.5.6-1 -> elm-2.5.6.3.legacy
> 7.3 elm-2.5.6-2 -> elm-2.5.6.3.legacy
>
> tcpdump:
> 7.2 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.2.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.2.4.legacy
> 7.3 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.3.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.3.4.legacy
> 8.0 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.8.0.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.8.0.4.legacy
Not quite. if the package is the same across the 7.x platform, the
disttag becomes 7x. But if there is no distag already in the package
name, please don't add one.
elm:
7.2 elm-2.5.6-1 -> elm-2.5.6-3.legacy
7.3 elm-2.5.6-2 -> elm-2.5.6-4.legacy
tcpdump:
7.2 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.2.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.2.4.legacy
7.3 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.3.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.7.3.4.legacy
8.0 tcpdump-3.6.3-17.8.0.3 -> tcpdump-3.6.3-17.8.0.4.legacy
This seems fine. In the past, RH has bumped the last number up, leaving
the "-17.x.x" alone, so we should follow suit on this one.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040116/66837c94/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list