mc packages need QA

[Arvand Sabetian]

Hello,

I noticed that a lot of packages are being put out however some are not
being tested (QAed?). This is probably the reason they are not being
published even a week after they are created. My question is that do you
think it is possible to run VMware (http://www.vmware.com/) and install RH
7.3/8.0/9.0 then test the packages using this? Or would the testing not be
accurate as it is being done in VMWare?

Also, how thorough of a testing do you require? I realize vulnerability and
functionality tests are a must but I sometimes don't even understand the
vulnerability rather than test it. So on some packages I would only be able
to tell if they install fine and whether they work or not.

Regards,

Arvand Sabetian

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-legacy-list-admin at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-legacy-list-admin at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Keating
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:42 PM
To: fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
Subject: mc packages need QA

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There is a set of mc packages for 7.2, 7.3, and 8.0 that need QA so that we 
can publish them ASAP.  Small flaw, but I'd like to see it fixed and 
published to show that we are capable of doing something.

https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1224

- -- 
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE	(http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team	(http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
Mondo DevTeam		(www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key
(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFACzXj4v2HLvE71NURAhVNAJ4yNIFyvotvLcMQXnKdod/kHOAKSACdGWVk
FrQ5AntWpdfbZBqX5L2ouEE=
=SyRt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list