When to bump the build?

[Christian Pearce]

Sucks,  but clearly it is a different revision.  I think we do this for people who are using this packages bleeding edge and want to be able to upgrade smoothly.  The other thing we could do is have a testing.legacy in the tag.  Allowing us to do what ever we want until we officially release.  I think that is a headache though.  Let just bump the rev if we have too.
--
Christian Pearce
http://www.commnav.com



Jesse Keating said:
> 
> A recent problem found in the 8.0 build of tcpdump shows that 
> autoconf213 is needed to complete the build correctly.  Because of 
> this, we need to modify the current candidate for publish in bugzilla.  
> Since we will be modifying it, should we bump the build ID up one more 
> on the package?  I think yes, as it shows clearly a newer package 
> within the ticket.  I'm pretty sure that RH goes through a few bumps 
> internally, as there can be a jump in the number from update to update.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -- 
> Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net)
> Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
> Mondo DevTeam           (www.mondorescue.org)
> GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
>  
> Was I helpful?  Let others know:
>  http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating