Fwd: Linux Broadcom 5820 Cryptonet Driver Integer Overflow

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Fri Jul 2 16:04:39 UTC 2004


On Friday 02 July 2004 08:58, Jon Peatfield wrote:
> Currently RedHat (etc) are maintaining kernels based on:
>
>   RHEL 2.1        2.4.9
>   RHEL 3          2.4.21
>
> Fedora are maintaining 2.4.22 for fc1
>
> and we have 2.4.20 for RH73/80/9 etc.
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to produce a srpm which would be usable for
> all these systems once fc1 stops being maintained by Fedora?
>
> [ I know this will be a lot of work of course! ]

I don't think I can agree to this.  Too much of a change, and it goes 
against our policy of change as little as possible.  If people want a 
newer kernel, they can either upgrade their base OS, or handle the 
kernel themselves.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040702/5a8c8a67/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list