Some sort of freeze process?

Simon Weller simon at nzservers.com
Fri Jul 2 16:22:34 UTC 2004


On Friday 02 July 2004 11:15 am, William Stockall wrote:
> Should people consider some sort of process for freezing packages which
> are to be released?  For example, all this discussion of whether to
> include yet another patch in the kernel.  What probably should happen is
> a package is frozen for release testing.  After that the only changes
> that go in are for problems introduced due to the proposed updates.  Any
>   further patches should go into the next release.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
yep I agree Will. That's kind of what I suggested a few hours ago as far as 
how crucial the patch is. Obviously if a massive root compromise comes out, 
it makes sense to patch it, but for everything else a freeze is logical.

- Si
>
> 				Will.
>
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

-- 
Simon Weller LPIC-2, BCIP
Systems Engineer
NZServers LTD
http://www.nzservers.com/
U.S. Branch

<-
To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, 
you just need to work on it.
 - Scott Granneman, Security Focus
->





More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list