openssl update

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Wed Mar 17 22:49:32 UTC 2004


On Wednesday 17 March 2004 13:17, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> It looks to me that these packages _are_ affected.
>
> At least for 7.3 it looks like packages listed in RHSA-2004:119-01
> (for example http://lwn.net/Articles/76125/ ) need just a modified
> "Release:" field in specs and that is about it.
>
> ftp://updates.redhat.com/enterprise/2.1AS/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-0.9.6b-
>36.src.rpm
> ftp://updates.redhat.com/enterprise/2.1AS/en/os/SRPMS/openssl095a-0.9
>.5a-24.src.rpm
> ftp://updates.redhat.com/enterprise/2.1AS/en/os/SRPMS/openssl096-0.9.
>6-25.7.src.rpm
>
> Just finished recompiling on RH7.3 an equivalent of
> openssl-0.9.6b-36.src.rpm and a compilation process runs quite a few
> tests while doing the job.  I will put something in bugzilla when I
> will check more.

What makes you think they are?  The only thing they are effected by is 
CAN-2004-0081, which is a one line fix.  See 
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=5721 for the fix.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040317/d30ca0b9/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list