packages needing QA and how to QA
David Botsch
dwb7 at ccmr.cornell.edu
Wed May 5 14:36:06 UTC 2004
Don't forget cvs:
http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1485
On 2004.05.05 02:55 seth vidal wrote:
> Hi all,
> Some packages need some more people to check them out.
>
> This is more or less how you do that:
> http://www.fedoralegacy.org/wiki/index.php/QaTesting
>
> the packages that need some checking:
>
> libxml2 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1324
> gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1371
> cadaver - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1552
> mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1548
> mozilla and friends - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1532
> kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
> lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1547
> rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1569
>
> packages that have two PUBLISH and are more or less there but wouldn't
> hurt from having more people try them:
>
> sysstat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1372
> libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1550
> utempter - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1546
> xchat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1549
>
>
>
> So download the packages, check the checksums, look over the patches,
> build/install them and tell us if things look right. the more input
> the
> less broken things will be. :)
>
> Thanks,
> -sv
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
>
--
********************************
David William Botsch
Consultant/Advisor II
CCMR Computing Facility
dwb7 at ccmr.cornell.edu
********************************
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list