Round-up, 2004-10-06
Dominic Hargreaves
dom at earth.li
Wed Oct 6 00:25:45 UTC 2004
Hi all,
We are making good progress in getting rid of the huge backlog that had
built up, and no doubt a raising a few eyebrows with ours advisories of
month-old issues ;)
However, we still have a little way to go, so if people could look at,
for example, verifying the packages listed as to verify below (ignoring
the ones marked as superceded) that would be great. Of course, if you
have a little more time, addressing the issues in the section entitled
"Packages in state UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED or REOPENED" would be
excellent.
Cheers,
List follows.
$Id: issues.txt,v 1.84 2004/10/06 00:25:23 dom Exp $
See bottom for changes
This list is also available at
http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~dom/legacy/issues.txt
Packages that have been verified and should be fully released
-------------------------------------------------------------
cvs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1735
Packages waiting to be built for updates-testing
------------------------------------------------
gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1371 (rh73,superceded)
abiword - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1906
glibc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1947 (fixed builds)
mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2089
Packages in state RESOLVED (ie exist in updates-testing) that need
active work.
------------------------------------------------------------------
gaim - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1237
Needs 2 VERIFY before release.
netpbm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1257
Needs 2 VERIFY
XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1289
Needs VERIFY before release (superceded).
mailman - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1269
There were some unconfirmed reports of breakage with the candidate. This
needs more QA before release.
kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1484
Needs missing file rebuilt for verification - but preferentially put
work into later kernel ticket
mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1532
Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded
lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1547
Needs 2 VERIFY but has been superceded
tripwire - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1719
Needs 2 VERIFY
squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1732
Needs 1 VERIFY before release (but about to be superceded?)
mod_proxy - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1737
Needs 1 VERIFY
kernel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1804
Needs 2 VERIFY
XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1831
Needs VERIFY for rh9 (superceded)
lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1833
Needs 1 VERIFY especially for rh9
php - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1868
Needs 2 VERIFY
mod_ssl - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1888
Needs 1 VERIFY
apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2068
Needs 2 VERIFY
cups - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2072
Needs 2 VERIFY
Packages in state UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED or REOPENED:
--------------------------------------------------------
* readline - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
Another not fixed before EOL (rh9). WONTFIX?
kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
Needs 2 PUBLISH (superceded)
yum - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1604
Needs 2 PUBLISH
krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1726
Obsoleted
libxml - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1324
Sort out confusion over status over version in updates-testing and add
RESOLVED flag.
mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1548
Need 1 PUBLISH (but superceded?)
libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1550
Superceded
libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1943
Need 1 PUBLISH for rh9
apache - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1805
Superceded.
mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1832
Needs 1 PUBLISH but superceded?
mozilla - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1834
Needs PUBLISH especially for rh73 and FC1, but superceded.
samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9
gnome vfs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1944
Needs PUBLISH, especially for rh9
sox - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1945
Needs possible renaming of rh7.3 package
qt - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2002
Needs 2 PUBLISH
gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2005
Needs 2 PUBLISH
mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2006
Needs 2 PUBLISH
ruby - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2007
needs work
kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2008
Needs 2 PUBLISH
mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2009
Needs 2 PUBLISH
pam_wheel - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2010
Needs PUBLISH and full auditing?
krb5 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2040
Needs 1 PUBLISH for rh9 / investigate possible bug introduced
imlib - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2051
Needs PUBLISH [rh73,rh9]
ImageMagick - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2052
Needs 2 PUBLISH
squid - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2053
Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9, packages for fc1
samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2057
Need maybe another PUBLISH for 7.3 otherwise building (superceded)
cdrecord - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2058
Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9
gtk2 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2073
Needs 2 PUBLISH
openoffice - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2074
Needs 2 PUBLISH for rh9 and fc1
libxpm - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2075
Needs PUBLISH for rh73,rh9
cupsomatic - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2076
Needs 1 PUBLISH
redhat-config-nfs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2086
Need 1 or 2 PUBLISH
samba - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2102
Needs PUBLISH for rh73
rp-pppoe - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2116
Needs packages
cups - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2127
Needs QA [rh9,fc1]
General (non-package bugs)
--------------------------
website docs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2111
FC1 docs missing
Notes
-----
Needs PUBLISH means that there are packages available for QA that need
to be QAd at the source level.
Needs VERIFY means that there are updates-testing packages that need
testing. This is the easy bit, let's get this old ones out of the way
ASAP.
* means that there is a judgement call that can be made on the bug
system immediately. Please follow up onlist with opinions.
Changes
-------
$Log: issues.txt,v $
Revision 1.84 2004/10/06 00:25:23 dom
update mozilla
Revision 1.83 2004/10/05 22:55:17 dom
more updates
Revision 1.82 2004/10/05 22:53:17 dom
update lots of stuff
Revision 1.81 2004/10/03 23:35:51 dom
add doc bug
Revision 1.80 2004/10/03 23:33:53 dom
update httpd, cups, netpbm
Revision 1.79 2004/10/03 13:03:33 dom
update mod_python, apache, sysstat, mod_ssl, sysstat
Revision 1.78 2004/10/02 23:29:39 dom
misc
Revision 1.77 2004/10/02 23:21:52 dom
update XFree86
Revision 1.76 2004/10/02 23:16:07 dom
update XFree86
Revision 1.75 2004/10/02 23:14:04 dom
update apache, libxpm
Revision 1.74 2004/10/02 16:33:14 dom
update php
Revision 1.73 2004/10/02 14:51:51 dom
update cups, squirrelmail
.#
Revision 1.72 2004/10/02 01:36:06 dom
update glibc, mod_python, cvs, fc1 stuff
Revision 1.71 2004/10/02 00:14:25 dom
updates glibc, mozilla, xfree86
Revision 1.70 2004/09/30 23:39:43 dom
remove built packages
Revision 1.69 2004/09/30 21:52:07 dom
many updates
Revision 1.68 2004/09/30 12:39:17 dom
delete flim, xchat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20041006/26e896c4/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list