Let's get moving

[Johnny Strom]

David Botsch wrote:
> If I read the QA doc correctly, what it actually refers to is getting stuff put
> into updates-testing, not moved out of updates-testing to updates.
> 
> After talking w. some folk in the channel, my understanding is that after 2
> weeks, if no one objects, packages should be moved from updates-testing to
> updates and released as final.
> 
> Unless I misunderstood, it also seems that only one person currently has the
> ability to actually do this. And, 2 weeks is also way, way, way tooo long. A
> couple days is more like it.


Yes that's right the problem is that it have taken to long to get them 
to a relase so how can we speed this up?
I think we need 2 or 3 ppl that have the rights to make relases.


> 
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 08:57:57AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> 
>>Matt Nuzum wrote, On 9/2/2004 7:48 AM:
>>
>>>I suggest that FLP create time-lines for which people can expect
>>>support.  RH 7.x (x>=1) came out in 2001, right?  How long does the
>>>community want to support it?
>>
>>It is quite clear how long RH 7.3 and 9 will be supported for, see the 
>>FAQ: http://www.fedoralegacy.org/about/faq.php  While it is not a 
>>specific date, I do not see that as a problem.  It will be supported as 
>>long as there is community support.
>>
>>In the end that is what the FL project requires to succeed, community 
>>support.  However, it just isn't a very exciting job to do backporting 
>>and testing of legacy software.
>>
>>For those of you wanting to see packages make it out of -testing, please 
>>see the QA Testing document.  It does quite a good job of describing the 
>>QA process.
>>
>>http://www.fedoralegacy.org/wiki/index.php/QaTesting
>>
>>-Dave
>>
>>
>>--
>>fedora-legacy-list mailing list
>>fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
>>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
> 
>