Let's get moving

David Botsch dwb7 at ccmr.cornell.edu
Wed Sep 8 16:58:08 UTC 2004


I think we may need a different status for something in update-testing, then.
If a bug is marked resolved, it doesn't normally show up when on searches for
LEGACY bugs (by say, clicking the link on the main FL page).

To me, resolved says, everything is done.

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 08:58:36AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:06:26PM +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > > Yes, they should be directed to this list, and the bugzilla entry is likely
> > > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1468
> > Ah, I guess I didn't expect a bug for a package in QA to be in status
> > RESOLVED. 
> 
> Sure -- issue itself has been resolved, but that resolution needs testing.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

-- 
********************************
David William Botsch
Consultant/Advisor II
CCMR Computing Facility
dwb7 at ccmr.cornell.edu
********************************





More information about the fedora-legacy-list mailing list