GPG key signature discrepancy
Will Bending
whb001 at shsu.edu
Thu Sep 30 16:04:43 UTC 2004
I have noticed that the following packages for rh 9 are using a non
Fedora-Legacy GPG key signature:
Name Arch Version Repo
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ethereal i386 0.10.3-0.90.4.legacy
updates-fedoralegacy
rsync i386 2.5.7-2.legacy.9
updates-fedoralegacy
Here is a sample:
[root at someboxonmynetwork /]# rpm -qip
/var/cache/yum/updates-fedoralegacy/packages/rsync-2.5.7-2.legacy.9.i386.rpm
warning:
/var/cache/yum/updates-fedoralegacy/packages/rsync-2.5.7-2.legacy.9.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 731002fa
Name : rsync Relocations: /usr
Version : 2.5.7 Vendor: Fedora Legacy
Release : 2.legacy.9 Build Date: Tue 28 Sep 2004
06:37:59 PM CDT
Install Date: (not installed) Build Host:
jane.fedoralegacy.org
Group : Applications/Internet Source RPM:
rsync-2.5.7-2.legacy.9.src.rpm
Size : 277714 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Tue 28 Sep 2004 06:48:02 PM CDT, Key ID
108c4512731002fa
Packager : Marc Deslauriers <marcdeslauriers at videotron.ca>
Summary : A program for synchronizing files over a network.
Here's the one I imported a while back from the FC Legacy project:
[root at someboxonmynetwork /]# rpm -qa gpg-pubkey*
gpg-pubkey-db42a60e-37ea5438
I'm holding off on installing them at this time because of this.
Just thought you'd want to be informed of it.
Thanks,
--will
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040930/159fba19/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list