separate emails to fedora-legacy-announce for each OS
Eric Rostetter
eric.rostetter at physics.utexas.edu
Thu Apr 21 22:20:56 UTC 2005
Quoting Joe Harrington <jh at oobleck.astro.cornell.edu>:
> It would be good if the fedora-legacy-announce emails had the same
> format as the fedora-announce-list emails.
They have the same format as the Red Hat Linux and Red Hat Enterprise
Linux announcements instead, no?
> Specifically, each message
> should state the distro it's for in the subject. I don't like having
> to dig (deeply) through each email to determine if the update applies
> to one of my systems. I'd rather be able to look at the summary at
> the top of the daily archive message and see it in the list there.
And I don't really want to get 4-6 copies of each advisory just because
it applies to that many releases. It would make my job of updating
the web site a lot harder also. And make the job of those releasing
the advisories at least a bit harder...
I'm not saying this can't be changed, but I am saying that other people
have different needs, and that we are following a well established
Red Hat method of doing things (even if Fedora Project differs).
> In pre-post discussions, it was suggested that my suggestion would
> proliferate the number of emails. While true, the solution already
> exists: get the list in archive form on a daily basis (when there is
> mail at all).
This may not be practical for many people/applications.
> The announcements are not of a down-to-the-minute,
> time-critical nature.
I think some people would disagree with that.
> An alternative would be to have a list per
> release. But, I think following the Fedora Project would be the way
> to go.
You haven't convinced me. While you've provided reasons both for and
against your argument, you've not managed to make me see why either way
is really better.
> So, following the pre-post discussions, I'll ask:
>
> How do others feel about following Fedora's one-post-per-OS scheme?
I don't like it, for the following reasons:
* More work for the people cutting updates (unless they can automate this
more for the future)
* More work for me (I update the advisories on the web site from the e-mails
sent to the announce list)
* Too many e-mails (and sometimes digest formats just aren't desirable).
* Most other distros do it our way (only Fedora Project differs that I know
of, though there are probably others).
> --jh--
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
Why get even? Get odd!
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list