RPM/YUM/Mach catch-22

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 12:59 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Not with rh73's version of rpm.  Epoch-less packages are the equivalent 
> of Epoch -1 (ie, Epoch: 0 trumps a lack of Epoch).
> 

Ah, my bad.  I glazed over the whole epoch thing, going with 'dont add
if not there, don't bump if there' 

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20051220/bdd8ae01/attachment.sig>