LWN article about us

[Marc Deslauriers]

On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 10:40 +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> Actually, if you're talking about the RedHat Linux distros, the last
> "stable" one was Redhat Linux 9. All the FC ones are being released way
> too fast and frequently to be used on a stable server.

rh7.0 - released September 2000 - 5 months after rh6.2
rh7.1 - released April 2001 - 7 months after rh7.0
rh7.2 - released October 2001 - 5 months after rh7.1
rh7.3 - released May 2002 - 7 months after rh7.2
rh8.0 - released September 2002 - 4 months after rh7.3
rh9 - released March 2003 - 6 months after rh8.0
fc1 - released September 2003 - 6 months after rh9
fc2 - released May 2004 - 8 months after fc1
fc3 - released November 2004 - 6 months after fc2
fc4 - projected to be released in May 2005 - 6 months after fc3

I don't see FC being released faster than RHL used to be. What makes you
think it's any less stable?

Marc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20050204/87a4175c/attachment.sig>