changes are needed, we need keep moving

[Pekka Savola]

On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Tom Yates wrote:
>> If one distribution version of a package has one VERIFY vote, all the
>> versions will automatically be released after a timeout of XX (where
>> I suggest XX is 2 weeks) from the first VERIFY -- except if someone
>> identifies issues which require discussion or more work.
>
> i'd still prefer that we released fixes for each OS as they passed the verify 
> bar, instead of waiting until all affected OSes have been QA'ed before 
> releasing any fix; that way, we don't release untested code, but unpopular 
> distros can't hold the popular ones to ransom.

My problem with this approach is that I think it generates a LOT more 
work for the FLSA release folks because there is more "churn".  For 
example, each event of publishing an update needs a separate FLSA 
advisory (or at least spamming all the mailing lists with an update to 
it), they have to be moved to updates one by one, etc.

.. 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings