buglist-rhl73.html [Re: changes are needed, we need keep moving]

[Pekka Savola]

On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> The process isn't broke, the process just sadly isn't easy to be
> involved with.
>
> Some things on http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl73.html are also
> not apparently correct (or maybe bugzilla is incorrect).  Take this
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152827 for
> instance.  Is it just a RH9 problem?  what about this one:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152792  is it only
> RH9 too?

This is a feature :).  You're looking at a wrong place.

Note that the script only does RHL73-speficic listing for PUBLISH and 
VERIFY stages, because there's no guarantee that the rest are 
properly classified.

For most QA purposes (unless you want to build packages and a little 
bit of something else), looking at PUBLISH and VERIFY only should be
sufficient.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings