just one VERIFY to be fully published

[nigel henry]

On Friday 18 Mar 2005 7:42 pm, Pekka Savola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll remind again that there are a lot of packages that require only
> minor testing to be fully released.  We need the folks to do this
> VERIFY.
>
> Below is the list of those packages for which a VERIFY is only needed
> on one architecture:
>
> Please help!
>
> ==========
> openmotif - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2143
> Needs VERIFY [fc1]
>
> sharutils - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2155
> Needs VERIFY [fc1]
>
> mailman - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2419
> Needs VERIFY [rh73]
>
> ruby - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2007
> Needs VERIFY [fc1]
>
> qt - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2002
> Needs VERIFY [rh73]
>
> mysql - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
> Needs VERIFY [fc1]
>
> ethereal - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2407
> Needs VERIFY [fc1]
>
> spamassassin - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2268
> Needs VERIFY [fc1]
>
> dhcp - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2251
> Needs VERIFY [rh73]
>
> imap - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2443
> Needs VERIFY [fc1]
> ===========
>
> btw, I guess nobody cares about FC1 anymore.  Unless someone actually
> adds a verify to some of those packages, I suggest we just either a)
> release the already verified versions and skip FC1, or b) not verify
> FC1 at all, but ship it in any case.
>
> I really hope there are more people out there willing to do QA for the
> upcoming FC2...
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

I only run Ethereal off the need to be verified list. I use FC1 a lot. Just 
tell me what I need to do and I'll check the Ethereal one out. Nigel