Getting help (was Re: FC2 quit connecting)
Michael Schout
mschout at gkg.net
Mon May 16 05:54:31 UTC 2005
Jason Lim wrote:
> I actually think providing legacy updates for the FC releases is going to
> implode sooner or later, since there are not enough people to keep
> supporting so many releases as they come out and the release maintainers
> and others are going to burn out..
In my opinion, doing the per-release bug split that has been discussed
here before would help. That way releases that do not have sufficient
interest or people working on them will not hold-up getting updates out
for other releases. We could look at releases that do not show enough
interest (e.g.: no activity for the release in bugzilla for a long
time), and drop support for those releases if there is not sufficient
resources to maintain them.
> I think focusing on legacy for Redhat 9
> would make far more sense, and seems the main reason the majority are
> using FedoraLegacy.org anyway.
I don't know about that. There are plenty of folks working on RHL7.3 as
well (myself included) :). I have QA'd a number of RH9 and FC1 packages
over the past week *ONLY* becuase I needed to do it to get security
fixes for 7.3 released :).
Regards,
Michael Schout
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list