Updates Politics Proposal
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Wed May 25 23:01:41 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:57 -0400, David Curry wrote:
> Before gravitating elsewhere, though, I will offer an opinion.
> Unless
> there is a restrictive covenent in Red Hat's support of Fedora Legacy
> that limits updates to "security" and "trivial" patches, there is
> reason
> to consider broadening "updates policy" somewhat beyond security
> only.
> Fedora Legacy updates policy and willingness of the community to
> support
> Fedora Legacy are not independent of one another. However the issue
> is
> resolved I wish the group well.
A) more man power is needed
B) more things can break, and thats not acceptable to the people who are
using Fedora / Red Hat in a longer term than what Red Hat itself
supports.
If you need an OS that has a long life span and gets some feature and
non-security bugfixing over time, please look at Red Hat Enterprise
Linux or the plethora of free rebuilds of it.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list