RHL9 glibc update OK with vanilla kernel?

[James Kosin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
 
Steve Snyder wrote:

>On Monday 14 November 2005 16:00, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 15:53 -0500, Steve Snyder wrote:
>>
>>>Are there any known compatibility problems with the current i686 glibc
>>>packages (released yesterday) and a plain-vanilla 2.4.3x kernel? Any
>>>loss of functionality or other Bad Stuff(tm)?
>>>
>>Unfortunately this isn't really part of our QA tests, so I don't think
>>there is a yes or a no that could come from the Legacy Project itself.
>>However a user may have already tried it...
>
>
>Yeah, I figured the testing was done in a purely RedHat/Legacy
>environment. I'm hoping another subscriber to the list is in a position
>similar to mine.
>
>
>--
>fedora-legacy-list mailing list
>fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

I'd like to know why you think the kernel relies on the glibc version?
What is it that has changed that effects the kernel?

James Kosin
(Running FC1 with generic 2.4.32 kernel)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFDeQDvkNLDmnu1kSkRAweaAKCC0kWRc36R7dAdSr3hkOEJdjDKNgCfT+Hn
vyYE8GzdH9VN8CArCRPYod0=
=pjGA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net