Upcoming transition of FC3

[Jim Popovitch]

Matthew Nuzum wrote:
>> The problem, and we have all seen this, is that those in the 'know' are
>> not the ones who would sue FL.  All it will take is for FL to
>> automagically update one package that breaks a custom billing
>> application on a bored lawyer's computer....   I don't think the risk is
>> worth trying to be noble.
> ... 
>> -Jim P.
> 
> BTW, FC isn't for bored lawyers and no one will get sued if FC breaks. FC is
> explicitly designed for people who need to be on the cutting edge of Linux
> and are willing to sacrifice the rock-solid stability that RHEL provides.

So, recall those copies of FC from those individuals that you feel 
aren't worthy of it.  Sorry, but the cat is already out of the bag.

> Anyone "in the know" who is deploying FC to bored lawyers or others
> computers in need of serious reliability is a glutton for pain, IMHO.

;-) you seem to miss my point, but your humor is still enjoyable.

-Jim P.