Fwd: Re: releasing updates-testing packages without VERIFY votes

[Rex Dieter]

Michal Jaegermann wrote:

> Personally I think that if a "release early, release often"
> principle would be applied to Legacy releases too, with a quick
> re-release to follow for an occasional dud (which happened anyway),
> we would be much further in the whole project. 

Hear, hear.  Amen brother.  If it's not clear, I comletely agree with 
Michal.  An occasional possible broken release is better than no release 
at all.

And please no separate repo for timed-out packages.  That's even worse.

-- Rex