1-2-3 out, time for FC2?
Mike McCarty
Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net
Mon Apr 10 04:28:04 UTC 2006
Eric Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net>:
>
>> I have volunteered some time for test if
>
>
> I will assume you mean the second part of QA, the "verify" step.
Well, perhaps I used the word "test" in a technical sense.
In my background, test means "verification of proper operation".
>
>> (1) The changes can be "contained" so that they do not compromise
>> my machine if they fail. IOW, there is a guaranteed backout
>> which loses no information.
[snip]
>> So far, (1) has been a sticking point, I think.
>
>
> This is a fact of life, and nothing specific to the FL Project.
> And it applies to released packages (ala the recent sendmail
> debacle) as well as test packages.
>
> In other words, there is little that FL can do to help you meet those
> two constraints. Even if we offered a virtual machine test environment,
> your lack of disk space would probably prohibit its use.
Most likely.
> Now, here is the real kicker:
>
> You can do the first step of QA (publish votes rather than verify votes)
> on ANY system and without compromising the system at all. It only involves
> comparing the files to other known files, etc. You don't have to install
> anything on the system. So, you can help, within your constraints, if
> you choose, by doing the first QA step rather than the second.
Ok, if you can give me more information, I'll be glad to donate some
time.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list