Pruning old vendor update packages?

[Jesse Keating]

On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 17:57 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> Just to make it clear: I'm referring to old updates that were
> obsoleted during RH's maintenance, e.g. which do not exist on
> redhat.com anymore, because RH ships a newer one in its updates
> folder. Last time I suggested this someone though that I was referring
> to vendor packages that had been superceeded by FL, that's not the
> case!

Please do a new check.  I thought I pruned everything that wasn't on the
RH download site.  I haven't pruned stuff that FL has since replaced, I
kind of wanted to keep what RH left and just add to it.  But I'll take a
look at the list you come up with.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060204/febaf7fd/attachment.sig>