no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 02:31 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Ok then, it seems to me that there is no longer any distinction
> between the released repository, and the test repository.
> So, please send out an e-mail three days before the first
> "timed release" so I can pull a last tested version before
> removing the legacy repository from my yum configuration. 

I appreciate your concern mike, however if we have people testing during
the timeout period, then there would be no untested packages.  If I see
too many packages go w/out testing on a given platform, I'm going to
drop that platform as not having enough community interest.  This is a
very self service project.  You get out of it what you put into it.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060214/cd29e86c/attachment.sig>