no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Marc Deslauriers]

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 14:44 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Since Legacy is no longer in my yum configuration, it's no longer
> an issue for me, good or bad. I don't wish to subscribe to "testing".
> Since "testing" and "release" have been merged, I have unsubscribed
> from "release". If the security notices on FC2 get severe enough,
> I'll just move on to CentOs, Scientific Linux, or Debian. Since
> I'm already helping administer a Debian box, it might make sense
> to move to that.

Just out of curiosity, what are the Debian, CentOS and Scientific Linux
QA procedures? Maybe Fedora Legacy could use some of them to get FL
releases up to their standards. They do have documented QA procedures,
right?

Marc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060214/b269c93b/attachment.sig>