no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Rahul Sundaram]

Marc Deslauriers wrote:

>On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 14:44 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
>  
>
>>Since Legacy is no longer in my yum configuration, it's no longer
>>an issue for me, good or bad. I don't wish to subscribe to "testing".
>>Since "testing" and "release" have been merged, I have unsubscribed
>>from "release". If the security notices on FC2 get severe enough,
>>I'll just move on to CentOs, Scientific Linux, or Debian. Since
>>I'm already helping administer a Debian box, it might make sense
>>to move to that.
>>    
>>
>
>Just out of curiosity, what are the Debian, CentOS and Scientific Linux
>QA procedures? Maybe Fedora Legacy could use some of them to get FL
>releases up to their standards. They do have documented QA procedures,
>right?
>  
>
You think?. I am not so sure they are well documented at all and Debian 
says on http://qa.debian.org/ "We know that, at the moment, there is no 
real quality assurance for Debian, in a conventional meaning of that 
term". Feel free to look for better QA processes than Fedora legacy 
within the community distributions and suggest ideas.

-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers