Friday Flames - What to do with RHL7.3/9 and FC1/2

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 09:27 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> 
> I'm willing to let you decide what the drop, with the above mentioned
> restriction that you provide a decent window for those of us running RHL
> to transition before you drop RHL updates.  Other than that one restriction
> I have no objection to any removals. 

Thanks Eric.  I had no intention of just dropping it, but thank you for
outlining a good plan.  Also I would add that at the time of 'drop' any
open bug reports for security problems would be resolved if possible.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060612/fc9ccc14/attachment.sig>