1-2-3 out, time for FC2?

[Tres Seaver]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 20 March 2006 11:01, Donald Maner wrote:
> 
>>With the release of FC5, I figured I'd start the discussion to gauge the
>>amount of support for keeping FC2 updates going. 
>>As specified in the FAQ, Fedora Legacy will pick it up and maintain it for
>>two additional Fedora Core release cycles. 
>>I believe FC1 still has the following to warrant continued work, what about
>>FC2?
> 
> 
> FC6 Test 2 would be the time in which FC2 would be eligible for the chopping 
> block.  Personally I'd like to see it go unless I get STRONG compelling 
> arguments to keep it.  Legacy is an extender, but not an indefinite one.  
> Longer life span needs ought to be using RHEL or one of the free rebuilds.
> 
> I'd also entertain pasturing FC1 at the same time.

- -1 from me (and I actually do some package QA for FC1).  No threat
involved, but if FC1 is dropped, I will have no further incentive not to
upgrade the only remaining Fedora box I have deployed to Centos.


Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 202-558-7113          tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEIAHU+gerLs4ltQ4RAg/rAJ91Mdm7GTgulFdmu4s06l2ZMrq0HQCfXzeS
IEWEc//tqiiChlTYZuO9XkA=
=/OCS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----