Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

[Jesse Keating]

So in the RHL space, the choice was clear.  Backport whenever possible.
However the Fedora landscape is different.  "Upstream" Core does not do
backporting, they more often than not version upgrade to resolve
security issues.  Why should Legacy be any different?  If we want to be
transparent to end users we should follow what "upstream" does.

Flames?  Thoughts?

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060515/c02942d8/attachment.sig>