Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 13:29 -0700, David Rees wrote:
> This seems like a sane policy to me!

Honestly, I think this is the model that "upstream" fedora uses too.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060515/8a9aab61/attachment.sig>