Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 16:40 -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> I'd say let's try and use backports, and use upgrades if it's the most
> logical solution.
> 

And follow upstream example if possible.  If "upstream" Fedora upgrades
to fix an issue, we probably should to for the Fedora's we're supporting
(shouldn't be more than 2 after this next transition), but if they
decide to backport, we should as well.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060515/dfcdc14d/attachment.sig>