Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 08 November 2006 05:43, David Eisenstein wrote:
> What say ye??

I'd say go with seamonkey.  RHEL is showing us a good example.  The "mozilla" 
codebase is dead and has been resurrected as seamonkey, so unless we want to 
generate our own patches (shudder) I'd highly recommend we take the RHEL 
route and replace mozilla with seamonkey.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20061108/a635273e/attachment.sig>