Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Wed Nov 15 14:23:04 UTC 2006
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:06:57PM -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> First I would like to say to those who say Fedora Legacy has failed, that
> it _did_ work (i.e. didn't fail) for the most critical time period and the
> most critical OS version (RHL 7-9, FC1). If it has failed, or is failing,
> it must not be forgotten that before it failed it worked exceedingly well.
Or at least moderately well. Let's not over-sell. :)
> Second, I'm fairly comfortable with saying that if FC goes to a 13 month
> support cycle, FL is basically not needed anymore. IMHO, people can upgrade
> once a year when presented with a known/documented release cycle, and known
> documented alternatives.
One month of annual overlap is still a bit short.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list