nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 29 November 2006 21:37, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:33:59AM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I would rephrase it in a positive way: Legacy is merged with Core and
> > Extras under one umbrella redefining EOL time marks. E.g. there is a
> > shorter total lifespan, but during that lifespan there is more
> > manpower assigned to get timely security fixes out.
> >
> > The current compromise is that FL was extending Fedora by 12 months,
> > where now it will be only 4 additional months. Reviving FL in these
> > terms would mean to try to extend a couple more months. But let's give
> > that new model a new chance first and measure demand and available
> > manpower after the first implementation of this model.
>
> Sounds good. I think the important thing, though, is to state clearly that
> FC3, FC4, and before are effectively unsupported *right now*.

I think this would be best.  Legacy was an experiment that worked for a period 
of time and has overtime worked less and less.  Interest has waned as well as 
willingness to participate.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20061129/938e6f1a/attachment.sig>