Fedora Core 4 Legacy security updates?

[James Kosin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Tim Thome wrote:
> David,
>
> Sounds like a good thing entering it into Bugzilla, however, if
> there is not a priority within Red Hat to fix it, the bug will sit
> there and rot... Might be a good time to split the bugzilla between
> active devlopment and legacy, and move the bugs over as needed,
> where they can be triaged, and dealt with in accordance with the
> Fedora Legacy charter.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Tim
>
Tim,

(1)  Don't top post....

(2)  It use to be separate; but, I'm a little fuzzy as to why it was
consolidated...  but, it is separate in a since.  You have to post it
in the Legacy section of Bugzilla.

(3)  Redhat is not responsible for fixing the BUGs.  It is the Fedora
Legacy support group which is.  Which comes right down to US in the
end.  Redhat manages and supports the group; but, it is the group of
volunteers that support the updates.

- -James
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFFLOgekNLDmnu1kSkRAv7/AJ95lpwIqBxEsU9Ghnesr3+gH37S0ACfZEa9
VH5xnG1vYduqxLoAziAr73w=
=8CEq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net