lwn article on the death of Fedora Legacy
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Fri Oct 20 17:31:08 UTC 2006
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 08:58:33AM -0400, James Kosin wrote:
> > E) See if any Fedora Core engineers are interested in, out of the goodness
> > of their hearts, building updates for their packages in Legacy when it
> > isn't much extra work -- and enabling them to easily do so.
> The only problem with this is WHY ever go with the latest FC6 or 7 or
> whatever if you can have the packages updated to the latest even if
> you have FC2.
I really don't think that's a major concern. Most packages wouldn't be
updated to the newest version -- just the ones where that's the easiest
thing to do.
> Legacy is all about security-updates!!! ONLY!!!
> The policy is update with PATCHES if at all possible. From RH even
> better; otherwise fall back to other sources for patches such as the
> development groups, etc. Only if EVERYTHING else fails, you can
> update to the latest stable release to fix the flaw.
Right now, everything is clearly failing.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list