[Fedora-legal-list] License short name: LGPLv2 or LGPLv2.1?

Michel Salim michel.sylvan at gmail.com
Sat Sep 8 16:15:03 UTC 2007


There is no release of LGPLv2, so the short names for LGPL listed on
the Licensing page are a bit unclear.

Would it be better to use LGPLv2.1, LGPLv2.1+ etc. as opposed to
LGPLv2 et. al.? It seems odd to refer to a non-existent license.

Thanks,

-- 
Michel Salim




More information about the Fedora-legal-list mailing list