[Fedora-legal-list] Fedora and MS-PL (Dynamic Language Runtime)
cjac at colliertech.org
Sat Aug 15 02:49:32 UTC 2009
We (the Debian CLI Libraries Team) are packaging IronRuby, IronPython
and the Dynamic Language Runtime for Debian. Much of the source in this
package is released under the Microsoft Public License:
I asked my friend Brett if he would help us get it packaged up in RPM
format for Fedora. He tells me that the MS-PL is not on the approved
list for Redhat packages:
14:55 < wakko666> cj: my main concern about packaging ironruby is licensing.
Fedora will accept packages under the MS-Shared-Source
license, but the MS-PL isn't on their list of acceptable
14:58 < cj> wakko666: alrighty. jschementi is the guy to talk with about
licensing issues. He'll be back some time soon, I'm sure
14:58 < wakko666> of course, i can always write the spec file and you guys can
host your own rpms, but it would be nice to actually get it
into Fedora proper.
14:59 < cj> also, MS-PL is dfsg compliant and [OSI]-approved. Is it a decision
to deny MS-PL or that it just hasn't been reviewed yet?
14:59 < wakko666> not sure. we'd need to ask on the fedora-legal-list mailing
14:59 < wakko666> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
[ed: I mis-wrote OSL-approved]
I do not see MS-PL on the DFSG wiki page:
However, Mono contains code licensed under MS-PL and it is part of the
main section, implying that it is compliant:
Are the MS-PL pieces of Mono stripped from the Fedora package of Mono?
Looking forward to your response,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Fedora-legal-list