[Fedora-legal-list] Fedora and MS-PL (Dynamic Language Runtime)
C.J. Adams-Collier
cjac at colliertech.org
Sun Aug 16 08:19:47 UTC 2009
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 13:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/16/2009 08:15 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > Yes, I do understand that part. :) I was simply correcting the point
> > that the MS Shared Source License was in any way acceptable for Fedora
> > (it is not).
> >
> > The MS Public License is acceptable for Fedora, Free but GPL
> > incompatible. I'm adding it to the table now.
>
> Can you let me know why it is GPL incompatible?
>
> Rahul
>
IANAL, but perhaps:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0-standalone.html#section11
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/attachments/20090816/d5c44fba/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-legal-list
mailing list