[Fedora-legal-list] Please define "effective license" (for the love of consistency)
oget.fedora at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 09:34:57 UTC 2009
1) I came across another review with the same license question. The
source files have one of the
GPLv2, GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ headers each. They get compiled and produce
1 final binary executable. None of the headers (or other source code
files) go to the final RPM.
What goes to the license tag of the package?
2) Hypothetical question (although happens rather frequently): What if
there was a -devel subpackage and .h files with different licenses
ended up in this -devel subpackage?
More information about the Fedora-legal-list