[Fedora-legal-list] package with data file from unicode.org

[Christian Krause]

Hi Jason,

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> CK> Otherwise the package contains only GPLv3+ source.  I have two
> CK> questions: What would be the correct License: entry in the spec
> CK> file?
>
> "GPLv3+ and MIT" if the MIT-licensed data files are included directly
> into the package; I suppose just GPLv3+ if they are somehow compiled
> into a binary with the GPL code.  If the former, also include a
> comment in the spec indicating which files are under which license.
> See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines for
> more info
Thank you very much for the information. I've updated the spec accordingly.
I'm looking forward that somebody reviews my new package. ;-)


Best regards,
Christian