[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] APSL 1.0



On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:53:49AM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:52:43 +0000
> "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones redhat com> wrote:
> 
> > APSL 1.0 is listed in Bad Licenses.  Is this because it is non-free,
> > or because it was deprecated and replaced (latest version of the
> > license is APSL 2.0) ?
> > 
> > I had a look at the license text[1] and it seems like clause 2.1 would
> > make it non-free.  But I'm no expert on this stuff ...
> > 
> > [1] http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/1.0.txt
> 
> See
> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/historical-apsl.html

Interesting, thanks.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/
Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]