[Fedora-legal-list] APSL 1.0
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Mon Feb 16 13:22:40 UTC 2009
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:53:49AM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:52:43 +0000
> "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > APSL 1.0 is listed in Bad Licenses. Is this because it is non-free,
> > or because it was deprecated and replaced (latest version of the
> > license is APSL 2.0) ?
> >
> > I had a look at the license text[1] and it seems like clause 2.1 would
> > make it non-free. But I'm no expert on this stuff ...
> >
> > [1] http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/1.0.txt
>
> See
> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/historical-apsl.html
Interesting, thanks.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/
Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora
More information about the Fedora-legal-list
mailing list